Also consistent with that order, DHS will continue to grant or deny renewal DACA requests, according to existing policy. If you have questions about this decision or want to learn more, visit our Additional Information re: JDACA Texas II decision page. Check out new themes, send GIFs, find every photo you’ve ever sent or received, and search through your account faster than ever. Sign in and start exploring all of the free organisational tools for your email. However, pursuant to the Jorder from the Southern District of Texas, DHS is prohibited from granting initial DACA requests and accompanying requests for employment authorization. Take a trip to an upgraded, more organised inbox. The Court, however, temporarily stayed its order vacating the DACA memorandum and its injunction with regard to individuals who obtained DACA on or before July 16, 2021, including those with renewal requests.Ĭonsistent with this order, DHS will continue to accept the filing of both initial and renewal DACA requests, as well as accompanying requests for employment authorization. District Court for the Southern District of Texas held that the DACA policy “is illegal.” The Court granted summary judgment on plaintiffs’ Administrative Procedure Act (APA) claims vacated the JDACA memorandum issued by former Secretary of Homeland Security Napolitano remanded the memorandum to DHS for further consideration and issued a permanent injunction prohibiting the government’s continued administration of DACA and the reimplementation of DACA without compliance with the APA.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |